Management as a Liberal Art Research Institute

Supporting Employees in an Angry America

Carol Mendenall, Ph.D.

PUBLISHED:

February 21, 2024

Though a topic of discussion currently, research and news outlets have been showing increased aggression in the workplace for decades as evidenced by physical and non-physical aggression examples by Glomb, et al. (2002). Brooks brought this topic back up last fall with the question, “Why are Americans so mean?” As more professionals leave the service industry due to difficult clients or patients (Brooks, 2023), more needs to be done to promote healthy employees in what should be a thriving workplace. All have personal stories of difficult co-workers, challenging students or clients, and negative or hostile behaviors of stakeholders. Several articles and research pieces have been written on burnout as many leave service professions, a career of choice, for a job elsewhere.


Brooks (2023) points out that the American society is in a crisis that is both ‘emotional’ and ‘relational.’ Though some researchers agree, such as Glomb, et al. (2002), there is a lack of research in this area. I propose that studies on this topic are limited due to what can be asked about employees and clientele due to privacy issues. Glomb, et al. (2002), suggest that it has just been ignored as more extreme behaviors have been studied first and current models do not include affect and emotion. Regardless, results on such topics lack data on ‘affective/emotional variables’. 


Research and discussion should be on what works to sustain quality workers and promote a positive business culture. A system of check and balance as Drucker and Zimbardo suggest supports a business system of healthy positive interactions. Zimbardo, author of The Lucifer Effect (2007), posits that good people will make wrong choices without a system of accountability. Drucker (2010) states that accountability is needed and must be tied to the needs of the organization. Organizational focus on a system of accountability that maintains the purpose of the entity is paramount.


In Drucker’s time, the experience was totalitarian government and aggression of a hostile ideology. My time, 2024, is a time of the absence of a sense of social community for the sake of individualism. Now is a time void of accountability in home, work, school, or society. Drucker experienced Hitler’s ability to convince ordinary people shunned by society that they should live with a sense of entitlement. This small group of people became an entitled race with only a sense of what was important to their small community and not society as a whole. Now we observe not just the notion of small in-group versus out-group thinking, but individualized entitlement. Now each student, client, each citizen lives with a sense of individualized entitlement. Campbell, et al. (2004) posit that ‘perceptual entitlement’ has a negative influence on interpersonal skills which “severely impacts social skills.” How do we reverse this? How do we keep Americans from believing that they are deserving of more than others? To answer this, more research is needed. In the meantime, organizations can do the following to reduce and diffuse negative encounters for their employees now.


Steps toward positive workplace culture


Whether a for-profit or non-profit, the organization must create a system of accountability, of check and balance, that is directly aligned to organizational purpose and supports positive growth behaviors in employees. Though management has control over this process, aggressive behavior in clientele cannot be neutralized. So how does one retain talented staff when repeated outside influences can be so negative and beyond control?


Create a buffer between aggressive and hostile clients and staff. When possible, have frontline employees that are well-equipped to handle angry clientele. Trained management should be prepared to step in before an escalation to be a buffer in these situations.


Create a safe space for frustrated employees to voice their feelings and concerns when negative encounters occur. Often speaking aloud to a non-judgmental coworker or management is enough to reduce the stress caused by the negative situation and shows the employee that the organization is supportive.


Create a menu of coping strategies for all employees including management so individuals are equipped to deal with a stressful situation, not take it personally, and avoid personal entanglement. These choices should be in line with the accountability process that is directly related to the organization’s goals and purpose.


Create an environment that promotes well-being and positive interactions. Individualized for each organization, management can promote positive behaviors through suggestion or influence. Visuals, trained employees, and strategic management that redirect behaviors may influence clientele response. Does the person feel listened to? Understood? Supported? Is clientele asked to restate comments or asked to communicate productively?


Being forward in clientele behavior expectations can cause initial stress and negative reactions, but it does support employee and clientele emotional health. Businesses and organizations are often at the forefront of what is needed for society. In an America that Brooks and Glomb et al. refer to as in ‘crisis’ and prone to ‘non-physical aggression,’ organizations need to focus on employee well-being and positive work culture through a system of accountability and intentionally created aggression-response systems.


This is a start to what needs to be continued research and implementation on this subject.



References


Brooks, D. (Sept 2023). How Americans Got So Mean. The Atlantic


Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A., Shelton, J., Exline, J., Bushman, B. (2004). Psychological Entitlement: Interpersonal Consequences and Validation of a Self-Report Measure. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 83(1), 29–45


Drucker, P. (2010). Managing the Non-Profit Organization. Harper-Collins, e-books.


Glomb, T. M., Steel, P. D., & Arvey, R. D. (2002). Office sneers, snipes, and stab wounds: Antecedents, consequences, and implications of workplace violence and aggression. In R. Lord, R. Klimoski, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Frontiers of industrial and organizational psychology: Emotions and work: 227–259. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.


Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect. Random House, NY.


By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. January 6, 2025
On December 13, 2024, we lost a seminal management philosopher and theorist: Charles Handy. Like Peter Drucker, Handy was a social thinker and management theorist who emphasized the human side of work as more important than profits and valued individual growth and development in organizations. Handy was born in Ireland and studied at Oxford. In 1956, he went to work for Shell, working in Borneo, where he met his future wife, Elizabeth Hill. Disillusioned by corporate life, Handy left Shell in 1962 to study management at MIT in their executive program. Inspired by their humanistic approach, he returned to London in 1967 to start the London Business School. Handy knew Drucker and was a regular keynote speaker at the Global Drucker Forum in Vienna. The two men had much in common in terms of their approaches to management and social theory. Like Drucker, Handy became an author (although, unlike Drucker, Handy was a corporate executive before he turned to writing). Handy wrote not just on business but also society, serving as much as a social ecologist as Drucker was. In his pivotal book, The Age of Unreason (1989), Handy argued for the disruption of discontinuity – resulting in a new world of business, education, and work that was highly unpredictable. He rejected shareholder capitalism and saw the organization as a place for human purpose and fulfillment, based on trust. Like Drucker, Handy advocated federalism in organizations, disseminating authority and responsibility to the lowest possible levels. He also saw “the future that had already happened.” Handy coined the term “portfolio life,” where knowledge workers would increasingly work remotely and for multiple organizations. In the 1980s, he posited that society consisted of “shamrock organizations”: those that had three integrated leaves: full-time employees, outside contractors, and temporary workers. Handy thus foresaw the new “gig economy” and increasingly autonomy of knowledge work. Finally, like Drucker, Handy had a life partner who not only supported his career but was an independent woman with her own interests. Liz Handy, like Doris Drucker, was an entrepreneur who ran an interior design business, and later was a professional photographer and Charles’s business agent.  Minglo Shao, founder of CIAM, remembers Handy as a warm man who made several important contributions to what we see as the fundamentals of Management as a Liberal Art. We are thankful for Handy’s contributions to management theory and social thought, and for his legacy at the Global Drucker Forum in the form of the Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series.
By Richard and Ilse Straub with the Drucker Forum Team December 29, 2024
For 15 years, Charles Handy did us the enormous honor of choosing the Drucker Forum as a privileged platform for delivering his message to the world, and particularly to the younger generation in which he had such faith. Following up on our initial announcement of Charles’ passing Charles Handy (1932–2024) , we are honored to share a selection of his key contributions to the Forum with our wider community. Charles’ brilliant keynotes at the Drucker Forum have become legendary. Normally accessible only to members of the Drucker Society, from today they are available as recordings to the wider public for a period of 30 days. At the first centennial Forum in 2009, Charles talked about his debt to Peter Drucker while outlining his own fundamental management concepts that he had developed over the years. Two years later, he touched on the ideas of Adam Smith and demonstrated how much more to them there was than the celebrated “invisible hand” of self-interest. In his landmark closing address in 2017, pursuing a thread developed in his 2015 book The Second Curve, he called for a management reformation that would turn it into a tool for the common good – thus drawing the first contours of what we would announce six years later as the Next Management . We took to heart his exhortation not to wait for great leaders but “to start small fires in the darkness, until they spread and the whole world is alight with a better vision of what we could do with our businesses”. Management’s "second curve" will be the focus of the “Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series” in 2025. Following the loss of his beloved wife Elizabeth in 2018 and a severe stroke, Charles was much reduced in mobility in his last years – but not in his determination to continue spreading his message of hope to the world. He couldn’t participate in person in the Drucker Forum 2022, but he participated in a moving online interview with his son Scott, who directed young actors in a short performance of Beckett’s Waiting for Godot by Beckett to illustrate some points.  Charles also contributed valued digital articles for our blog and for Drucker Forum partners. Even during the most difficult period of his life he continued to write and develop his ideas in weekly columns for the Idler magazine. This entailed first memorizing the article, then dictating it and finally reviewing it by having someone it re-read to him – a remarkable feat of memory and determination. The article is a jewel and most appropriate for Christmas and the season of self-reflection. Have a wonderful Christmas, happy holidays and a healthy and prosperous New Year.
By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. November 19, 2024
Interview with Karen Linkletter at the 16th Global Peter Drucker Forum 2024  Video Interview
Show More
Share by: