Management as a Liberal Art Research Institute

How to Apply Management as a Liberal Art *

William A. Cohen, Ph.D.

PUBLISHED:

July 3, 2023

Five years before he died, Peter Drucker revealed his basic belief about management for the first time. What a surprise!  He wrote: “Management is what tradition used to call a liberal art - ‘liberal’ because it deals with the four fundamentals of knowledge, self-knowledge, wisdom, and leadership; ‘art’ because it deals with practice and application.”

 

That’s not what others said. They said that management was a science.  The popular manta was and is “quantitative analysis for business decisions.” Most management practitioners ignored the liberal arts and focused on economics and quantitative analysis.

 

If Drucker is correct, a different approach is desirable. The impacts of ethics and social responsibility in management are not just desirable, they are required. But there’s more emphasis than Drucker’s words. To neglect the fact that liberal arts are necessary in decision-making, problem-solving, and discovery, is also to ignore the fact they have been used and their need proven by scientists for centuries. They have not only verified the liberal arts as effective, but in many cases proven them critical to success. Albert Einstein, a world-renowned scientist who accomplished amazing discoveries in theoretical physics, used not quantitative analysis, but the liberal arts in his work. Einstein’s theory of relativity, for example,  was accomplished by his imagining himself traveling with a beam of light and what was observed to those remaining stationery, not computers and economic analysis.

 

Einstein employed liberal arts in many other discoveries. He was awarded the Nobel prize in Theoretical Physics for four papers  all published in one year, 1905. How he did this he explained in a letter to the London Times dated November 28, 1919. Among these is probably the world’s best known equation, E = MC²,  representing the conservation of energy. He calculated this the same way,  using the liberal arts along with the theory of relativity the same year.  For these four major papers, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Theoretical Physics. He used the liberal arts. Einstein didn’t use computers, had no lab assistants, and didn’t have a room with chalk-filled blackboards. He was an unknown and did the research while in an entry level position as a patent examiner at the Swiss Patent Office in Bern after receiving his PhD at the University of Zurich.

 

Economics are but One of Many Topics


Drucker demonstrated that though numbers may be a factor in successful profitability in decision-making, there are always other factors which may be significant in a different situation which can be more important and must not be ignored. Ethics and social responsibility are two important examples. Because management is an art and decisions must be made about an issue and environment that are more complicated and subject to more variability than numbers alone, other topics are equally, and sometimes more important. As an art, such work deserves to be accomplished as if you were developing a musical sonata, painting, or sculpture because, that’s pretty much what you’re doing.

 

Drucker’s Approach


When Drucker wrote that management was a liberal art, some thought he was anti-science. He wasn’t. But Drucker frequently found advantages to the use of the liberal arts and sometimes even non-quantifiable factors were more important than “quantitative analyses.” He used quantitative methods when appropriate but did not omit important non-quantifiable facts. For example, he showed that while profitability in business was necessary, maximum profitability might not even be a worthwhile or even an ethical goal, even if it were possible by segmenting the market.

 

Earning a PhD Under Drucker


Ten years after I received my MBA at a first-class business school which prided itself on being arguably the leading school in quantitative management decision making, I entered the PhD program which had been co-developed by Drucker including courses taught only by him and his dean, Paul Albrecht. Their methods differed significantly from other professors. Drucker maintained that at the end of the day, managers make decisions from the gut, and that economics was just one input, and not the only one. He specified four fundamentals necessary for what is now known as Management as a Liberal Art or MLA: 1. Knowledge, 2. Self-knowledge, 3. Wisdom, and  4. Leadership.

 

 

Specific Knowledge, the First Fundamental


Drucker listed the following topics that are traditionally included among liberal arts topics: Humanities, Social Sciences, Psychology, Philosophy, Economics, History, Physical Sciences, and Ethics. Unsurprisingly unique knowledge is frequently generated when someone from a different organization, industry, company, country or specialty joins yours. Drucker’s experience was that the most important innovations tend to arrive in this way. Therefore, any knowledge may be useful in a particular situation for a successful solution. Therefore, potential solutions based on unfamiliar ideas should be welcomed, evaluated, and not ignored regardless of source.

 

Self-Knowledge, the Frequently Overlooked Fundamental


“Self-knowledge” refers to knowledge of one’s own sensations, thoughts, beliefs, and other mental states, but also the state of your organization. Self-knowledge comes from experience, success, failure, observation, and reflection on lessons learned and applied, but also an examination of conditions and resources in your own organization including both strengths and weaknesses.

Two thousand years ago the Chinese philosopher and successful military general, Sun Tzu, wrote: “If I know myself and know my enemy, I need not fear defeat in 100 battles. If I know only myself, I will lose half. If I know only my enemy and not myself, I will lose all.” This says that while knowing your potential competition is important, knowing your own capabilities and limitations may be even more so.

 

 

The Fourth Fundamental is Wisdom


Most believe that wisdom originates from experience, but one must use the experience gained and review results before it can be said that wisdom has been assimilated and demonstrated. Though difficult to acquire, many cultures, including our own, believe in its importance. The Chinese culture, one of the oldest existing cultures assign it a high value. There are also 222 mentions of wisdom in the Jewish Holy Scriptures and wisdom is thought to be a foundation of Jewish thought. Certain wisdom was observed abroad and considered unique in America as early as 1815.

 

In that year, an artistic  work on his impression of this unfamiliar new country was completed by James Barralet, an emigrant of Irish and French origin. He described it simply as “America Guided by Wisdom” and created an engraving representing this concept that still hangs today in the Library of Congress in Washington, DC. Of course, a lot has happened since 1815, and we sometimes make mistakes during wisdom’s formation, but the effort and its results are still self-evident.

 

The Most Important Element of MLA: Leadership


Drucker investigated and found that 50% of the results of management decisions come from leadership, while all other actions contribute smaller individual percentages to constitute the remaining 50%. However, Drucker made it clear that the leadership he recommended must be practiced ethically.

 

A business must be profitable to continue to operate, but society also demands from businesses social responsibility. Drucker constantly pointed out examples. One of his favorites was case of Julius Rosenwald, President and later Board Chair of Sears Roebuck from 1908 until his death in 1932 which was a period of its great growth. He established the Rosenwald Fund, which was the first of its kind and donated millions of dollars in matching funds to promote the vocational and technical education of minority employees, noting that he considered this a duty. In those days this was a highly unusual act.

 

Drucker added that while society expected a company to be profitable it had no expectation or requirement that a company generate maximum profits especially through questionable or unethical tactics.

 

An Art Concerns Practice, Application and Results


As Drucker pointed out, as an art, MLA deals with practice, application, and results.  Contrary to the poor conduct and practices that sometimes appear, Drucker maintained that only the best and highest ethical conduct was acceptable. As Drucker’s former student and remembering his values and teachings, I doubt whether he would change his opinion as to what he believed regardless of what others might think or some of the poor examples of leadership sometimes observed by leaders in well-known business or government .

 

This sets MLA apart and the leadership he demanded is not always easy. Unlike use of mathematic formulae, the learning of which may be confirmed by memorization, paper application, and testing for significance, mastery of MLA can only be demonstrated by application, which includes not only performance, but maintaining ethical values and responsibility. As Doris Drucker, Peter’s widow, said on several occasions “I admired much about my husband, but most of all, I admired the values he believed in and represented.”

 

References

*Adapted from the following with extracts published internationally

Drucker on Leadership by William A. Cohen (Jossey - Bass, 2010

Drucker’s Way to the Top by William A. Cohen (LID, 2019)

The New Art of the Leader, by William A. Cohen (Prentice Hall, 2000)

The Art of the Leader, 3rd edition by William A. Cohen (Pyramid Press, 2018)

The Art of the Strategist (audio version) by William A. Cohen (Harper Collins, forthcoming, 2023-24)

 

 

 

By Byron Ramirez Ph.D. March 7, 2025
Motivation and performance in the workplace have been the subject of extensive research, yet a comprehensive understanding of their complexities remains elusive. While many organizations recognize the importance of motivation in driving employee performance, a significant number still approach motivation through simplistic, linear models that fail to capture its depth. Traditional methods, such as annual performance reviews with occasional praise or monetary bonuses, may have some impact, but they are often insufficient in fostering long-term employee engagement and sustained productivity. The relationship between motivation and performance is intricate, requiring a more nuanced and strategic approach from organizations. Motivation plays a crucial role in organizational sustainability. When employees are motivated, they exhibit higher levels of productivity, creativity, and commitment, all of which contribute to an organization’s long-term success (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and sustainability. However, many organizations continue to rely on outdated methods that focus primarily on the provision of extrinsic rewards. While financial incentives, such as salary increases and bonuses, can have a positive impact, research indicates that their effect on motivation is often temporary (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999). Once the external reward is removed, motivation levels tend to return to their previous state, highlighting the limitations of this approach. In contrast, organizations, and more specifically managers who have invested in fostering an environment that develops genuine engagement and trust, thus increasing motivation within their teams, have recognized the importance of intrinsic rewards. Intrinsic motivation, which arises from within the individual, is driven by factors such as personal growth, job satisfaction, and a sense of purpose (Pink, 2009). Employees who find meaning in their work and feel a sense of autonomy are often more engaged and perform better than those who are solely motivated by external incentives. This aligns with Self-Determination Theory, which emphasizes the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Moreover, this also is consistent with the philosophy of Management as a Liberal Art which highlights the importance of independent decision-making. Despite the emphasis on extrinsic rewards, research suggests that human beings are only driven by them to a certain extent. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (1959) highlights this by distinguishing between hygiene factors (such as salary and job security) and motivators (such as achievement and recognition). While hygiene factors can prevent dissatisfaction, they do not necessarily lead to increased motivation. Instead, true motivation stems from intrinsic factors that align with an individual's values, aspirations, and personal goals. Not every employee seeks to climb the corporate ladder; some may find fulfillment in mastering a specific skill, contributing to a meaningful project, or maintaining a healthy work-life balance. As a result, managers must move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach and develop a deeper understanding of the psychology behind motivation. Recognizing individual differences and tailoring motivation strategies to align with employees’ unique needs can lead to greater job satisfaction and improved performance (Gagné & Deci, 2005). This means fostering a work environment that promotes autonomy, provides opportunities for growth, and acknowledges employees’ contributions in meaningful ways. Organizations should also consider the long-term implications of their motivation strategies. Rather than merely offering short-term incentives, they should invest in creating a workplace culture that values intrinsic motivation. This can be achieved through leadership development programs, mentorship opportunities, and fostering a sense of community within the organization. When employees feel valued and supported (and listened to), their motivation is more likely to be sustained, ultimately benefiting both the individual and the organization as a whole. One effective strategy is providing employees with opportunities for continuous learning and professional development. Organizations can offer training programs, workshops, and tuition reimbursement to help employees acquire new skills and expand their expertise. When employees see that their company is invested in their growth, they are more likely to remain engaged and committed to their work. Furthermore, providing employees with challenging yet attainable goals can foster a sense of accomplishment and reinforce their intrinsic motivation. Additionally, fostering a culture of recognition and meaningful feedback is essential. While monetary rewards can provide temporary satisfaction, genuine appreciation and acknowledgment of employees' contributions create a lasting impact. Managers can implement regular check-ins, peer recognition programs, and public acknowledgments of achievements to make employees feel valued. When employees receive positive reinforcement for their efforts, they are more likely to stay motivated and take pride in their work.  While financial incentives and extrinsic rewards have their place in workplace motivation, they are not a panacea for enhancing performance. Motivation is a complex and deeply personal phenomenon that requires organizations to adopt a more holistic approach. By understanding the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and recognizing the unique aspirations of employees, organizations can create an environment that fosters sustained motivation and long-term success. Investing in the psychological and professional well-being of employees is not just a moral imperative but a strategic necessity for organizational sustainability. References Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons. Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
By Michael Cortrite Ph.D. February 26, 2025
In 1995 Daniel Goleman published a groundbreaking book which introduced the leadership/management discipline to emotional intelligence.The book is Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more that IQ (Bantam 1995). Over the last 30 years more than 20 book and hundreds of papers have been published on emotional intelligence (abbreviated as EQ) extolling its effectiveness as a leadership concept. Many of the books were authored by Goleman with his co-writers Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee. Given the current political climate in the United States and the world, the concept of EQ may be even more relevant today than it was 30 years ago. EQ shows an incontrovertible link between a leader’s emotional maturity and their performance as a leader. In the words of Daniel Goleman, “The research on EQ shows that the ‘good guys’—emotionally intelligent men and women—finish first” (Goleman, et al. p.169. 2001). Just as Peter Drucker’s insistence on self-knowledge and the knowing of one’s strengths and weaknesses is the starting point in his essay, Managing Oneself (1999), EQ starts with knowing yourself, including your weaknesses and strengths, and especially your emotions. Drucker also talked about values and manners. Manners is all about people working in close contact with each other and therefore naturally causing friction. He said that workers must be able to cooperate and treat each other with courtesy and respect. In order to do this, they must look inward to make sure they use words like thank-you and please and they know their co-workers’ names and even the names of their family members. He didn’t specifically use the word emotions but was writing about a basic form of emotional intelligence. Goleman, et al. (2001) lists the four components of emotional intelligence in action: 1. Self-awareness: The ability to read your own emotions. Knowing how your moods are affecting others. 2. Self-management: The ability to control your emotions. Don’t let bad moods seize the day; leave them outside the office. 3. Social awareness: The ability to sense other people’s emotions and show that they care. Understand how your words and actions affect other people and be able to change them when their impact is negative. 4. Relationship-management: The ability to build strong personal bonds and use these skills to spread their enthusiasm and solve disagreements, often with humor and kindness. It should be noted that Diamantidou et al. (2024) found a strong link between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership that translates to a positive organizational culture and thus increased organizational effectiveness. In late 2024, Pixar released an animated movie, Inside Out 2. It is a sequel to the movie Inside Out. It is already the highest grossing animated movie in history. The movie is based on emotional intelligence. Daniel Goleman praised the movie and said, it is clever and moves the field of social-emotional learning forward. The leadership literature cites many examples of the value of using films to teach leadership. Wiliams (2006) posits that because films are memorable and a catalyst for thought and discussion, there is always rich dialogue generated, and a better understanding of the concept being taught after watching the movie. The characters in the movie are Riley (the human) and Joy, Sadness, Anger, Fear, Disgust, and Anxiety (the emotions). Chatbot (2024) explains that watching the movie can help leaders by dramatically showing how emotions influence both personal and social interactions. The movie also depicts such emotional intelligence concepts as self-awareness, self-management, building empathy, the power of vulnerability, leading by example, and the benefits of transparency. REFERENCES: Chatbot, H. How Inside Out 2 Can Improve Your Leadership Skills. Entrepreneurial Leadership. July 30, 2024. Diamantidou, V., Kaitelidou, D., Kalakairinou-Anagnostopoulou, A., and Galanis, P. Organizational Culture, Transformational Leadership and Emotional Intelligence. Journal of International Caring Services Vol. 17 (2). May/August 2024. 1190-1196. Drucker, P. Managing Oneself. (1999) In HBR book, On Managing Yourself. pp. 13-32. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., and McKee, A. (2001). Primal Leadership: The Hidden Driver of Great Performance. In HBR book, On Managing Yourself. pp. 169-188. Wiliams, J. Pirates and Power: What Captain Jack Sparrow, His Friends, and His Foes Can Teach Us About Power Bases. Journal of Leadership Education Vol. 5 (2). Fall 2006. 
By Mehak Suri February 25, 2025
Drucker’s claim that “reliance on the expert to predict the outcomes of technology is born out of hubris” (Drucker, 1969, p. 524) still holds and will likely continue to be the same. Each development is caused by and leads to several factors, “each independent in its origins,” with the “outgrowth of a separate discipline with its own experts” (Drucker, 1969, p. 524). Aristotle’s syllogisms (a kind of logical argument) are the reason ChatGPT exists today. The statement above sounds bizarre, but Boolean logic was invented in the 1800s to mathematically represent syllogisms. Claude Shannon, in 1937, demonstrated the use of Boolean algebra in designing electrical circuits, which paved the way for GPUs, programming, digital computers, and AI systems like ChatGPT. Claude Shannon could not have predicted that his design of electrical circuits would someday contribute to the fragmentation of human interaction (social media), digital overload and decision fatigue (social media), erosion of creativity through AI-assisted writing, and increased energy consumption and pollution (large AI models lead to high electricity usage and carbon emissions from data centers). This indicates that “the impacts of technology are often quite indirect and by-products rather than main products” (Drucker, 1969, p. 524). Sometimes, even the most direct use cases of modern technology have unintended adverse consequences, leading to “the cost being more than the worth” (Drucker, 1969, p. 523). The Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) systems in healthcare were designed to reduce medical errors and improve the quality of patient care. However, studies have shown unintended net adverse effects due to clinicians’ overreliance on this technology and diminished critical thinking. CPOE systems with inbuilt clinical decision support (CDS) help clinicians by providing “notifications of drug-drug interactions, warnings about allergies, recommendations for clinical guideline compliance, and more” (Campbell et al., 2007, p. 96). For example, anticoagulants and aspirin are usually not prescribed together. However, this combination is often used for heart protection benefits in coronary care. In this context, using these two drugs together would be helpful, but the CPOE system would trigger an alert warning the clinician. If the clinician relies exclusively on CPOE, they may remove one of the two drugs from the therapy, increasing the potential risk to the patient (Campbell et al., 2007). Going back to the previous example, even if Claude Shannon could foresee all the negative impacts of technological advancements stemming from his invention, he would not have stopped his development, as there were foreseeable immediate and long-term net-positive outcomes, too. As Drucker puts it, in this new age of technology, we need new decision-makers and decision-making processes built on understanding the history and dynamics of technology instead of focusing on predicting the outcomes of technology or determining what is right or wrong (Drucker, 1969).  References Drucker, P. F. (1969). Comment: Is Technology Predictable? Technology and Culture, 10(4), 522-527. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101571 Campbell, E. M., Sittig, D. F., Guappone, K. P., Dykstra, R. H., & Ash, J. S. (2007). Overdependence on technology: an unintended adverse consequence of computerized provider order entry. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2007, 94-98.
Show More
Share by: