Management as a Liberal Art Research Institute

Interview with Francisco Suarez

Robert Kirkland, Ph.D.

PUBLISHED:

April 25, 2022

The triple bottom line is the new standard. Are you onboard?

The triple bottom line is the new standard. Are you onboard?


As a leader, you have the power to transform communities … but only if you are doing these three things.


When applied to Management as a Liberal Art (MLA), the triple bottom line is a fresh take on an existing framework.

Francisco Suarez, CEO of AdeS for Latin America

It’s all about where vision meets the three Ps: People, Profit, Planet.


Francisco Suarez, the CEO of AdeS for Latin America asks you to look at it another way.


Social, Economic, and Environmental value.


So what is the triple bottom line, and how did Drucker predict its importance in the modern world? Is your organization providing value in all three areas? Or have you not redefined your bottom line? Let’s discuss.


While profit is the typical metric for success, it is not the only one that matters. For Francisco Suarez, every company vision needs to incorporate the triple bottom line.


University of the People explains that a successful business operates by taking ‘into account its expenses and impact on people and the planet.’

An organization transforms the communities where it operates when all three values – social, economic, and environmental – support its single vision.


Giving equal weight to profit and social and environmental concerns is the new bottom line.


It’s time to expand the impact your business, and management approach can have on the world. Francisco Suarez builds on Peter Drucker’s philosophies, highlighting a corporation’s three obligations:


Social

Both Drucker and Suarez see management as the catalyst for every successful organization. And every successful organization plays a huge role in society. Peter Drucker posits that successful organizations support self-development in their people. In other words, developing your workers makes for a better society.


So if it all comes down to people, how can the individual leader support this development? The answer is self-knowledge.


Self-knowledge as a leader is essential. It’s a balance of both experience and an internal belief in yourself that makes a valuable leader.


Yes, you always try to have the best information possible. But thought leaders like Minglo Shao (founder of CIAM), insist that what sets successful leaders apart is their ability to know and act on their gut decisions.


It takes great executives to ensure organizations are intentional about their impact on society. Suarez exemplifies this in his work for FEMSA. A pioneer in social and environmental practices, FEMSA stands firm in the social aspect of its company vision.


It is a leader's responsibility to know themselves. Without self-knowledge, an organization's societal impact diminishes.


Economic

Just as knowing yourself is key, so is knowing your competitors.


An organization’s economic impact is by far the most measurable by today's standards. It’s not to say we won't have better tools to measure social and economic impact in the future. But for now, no business leader is a stranger to economic impact.


Every single company measures its profit and loss. But Suarez tells us that economic success is also directly tied to social and economic value.


University of the People says it well. “Caring about society and the environment isn’t in opposition to being profitable. In many instances, the companies that care about more than just their bottom line end up being more profitable because people like supporting companies that care.”


You must redefine what the “bottom line” means to your organization. And find value in more than just financial profit.


Environmental

Companies make environmental sustainability possible.


As much as the individual must also take action to make a difference, it is not the actions of the individual that make a true environmental impact. Instead, it is organizations that have the resources to enact true environmental change.


But the big companies cannot do this alone. Leaders must be humble enough to acknowledge that there are things they don’t know and be open to working with other sectors. Suarez reminds us that collaboration is vital to environmental impact.


Yes, organizations make environmental sustainability possible. But we also need consensus. A multi-sector collaboration that does not yet exist.


Suarez uses the example of the United States leaving the Paris Climate Accords. And then returning. Big companies cannot alone be responsible for environmental impact. Individuals and political policies must be considered as well.


There must be a consensus across sectors about what is, and what is not, negotiable when it comes to making an environmental impact.


Peter Drucker’s philosophy of management as a liberal art has influenced many thriving business leaders and minds. Francisco Suarez uses Drucker's insight daily and has seen real-world results.


He asks us all to be social ecologists. To think beyond economic and financial impact. To ensure that every project incorporates the triple bottom line in their vision.


While the concepts may have changed over time, Peter Drucker's principles remain useful in today's business landscape. Francisco Suarez has felt their impact through his work and encourages us all to do the same.


Sources:

https://open.spotify.com/show/2Ct5vJOgGkazlg2md6qMAG

https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/triple-bottom-line/

https://www.femsa.com/en/about-femsa/about-us/

By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. January 6, 2025
On December 13, 2024, we lost a seminal management philosopher and theorist: Charles Handy. Like Peter Drucker, Handy was a social thinker and management theorist who emphasized the human side of work as more important than profits and valued individual growth and development in organizations. Handy was born in Ireland and studied at Oxford. In 1956, he went to work for Shell, working in Borneo, where he met his future wife, Elizabeth Hill. Disillusioned by corporate life, Handy left Shell in 1962 to study management at MIT in their executive program. Inspired by their humanistic approach, he returned to London in 1967 to start the London Business School. Handy knew Drucker and was a regular keynote speaker at the Global Drucker Forum in Vienna. The two men had much in common in terms of their approaches to management and social theory. Like Drucker, Handy became an author (although, unlike Drucker, Handy was a corporate executive before he turned to writing). Handy wrote not just on business but also society, serving as much as a social ecologist as Drucker was. In his pivotal book, The Age of Unreason (1989), Handy argued for the disruption of discontinuity – resulting in a new world of business, education, and work that was highly unpredictable. He rejected shareholder capitalism and saw the organization as a place for human purpose and fulfillment, based on trust. Like Drucker, Handy advocated federalism in organizations, disseminating authority and responsibility to the lowest possible levels. He also saw “the future that had already happened.” Handy coined the term “portfolio life,” where knowledge workers would increasingly work remotely and for multiple organizations. In the 1980s, he posited that society consisted of “shamrock organizations”: those that had three integrated leaves: full-time employees, outside contractors, and temporary workers. Handy thus foresaw the new “gig economy” and increasingly autonomy of knowledge work. Finally, like Drucker, Handy had a life partner who not only supported his career but was an independent woman with her own interests. Liz Handy, like Doris Drucker, was an entrepreneur who ran an interior design business, and later was a professional photographer and Charles’s business agent.  Minglo Shao, founder of CIAM, remembers Handy as a warm man who made several important contributions to what we see as the fundamentals of Management as a Liberal Art. We are thankful for Handy’s contributions to management theory and social thought, and for his legacy at the Global Drucker Forum in the form of the Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series.
By Richard and Ilse Straub with the Drucker Forum Team December 29, 2024
For 15 years, Charles Handy did us the enormous honor of choosing the Drucker Forum as a privileged platform for delivering his message to the world, and particularly to the younger generation in which he had such faith. Following up on our initial announcement of Charles’ passing Charles Handy (1932–2024) , we are honored to share a selection of his key contributions to the Forum with our wider community. Charles’ brilliant keynotes at the Drucker Forum have become legendary. Normally accessible only to members of the Drucker Society, from today they are available as recordings to the wider public for a period of 30 days. At the first centennial Forum in 2009, Charles talked about his debt to Peter Drucker while outlining his own fundamental management concepts that he had developed over the years. Two years later, he touched on the ideas of Adam Smith and demonstrated how much more to them there was than the celebrated “invisible hand” of self-interest. In his landmark closing address in 2017, pursuing a thread developed in his 2015 book The Second Curve, he called for a management reformation that would turn it into a tool for the common good – thus drawing the first contours of what we would announce six years later as the Next Management . We took to heart his exhortation not to wait for great leaders but “to start small fires in the darkness, until they spread and the whole world is alight with a better vision of what we could do with our businesses”. Management’s "second curve" will be the focus of the “Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series” in 2025. Following the loss of his beloved wife Elizabeth in 2018 and a severe stroke, Charles was much reduced in mobility in his last years – but not in his determination to continue spreading his message of hope to the world. He couldn’t participate in person in the Drucker Forum 2022, but he participated in a moving online interview with his son Scott, who directed young actors in a short performance of Beckett’s Waiting for Godot by Beckett to illustrate some points.  Charles also contributed valued digital articles for our blog and for Drucker Forum partners. Even during the most difficult period of his life he continued to write and develop his ideas in weekly columns for the Idler magazine. This entailed first memorizing the article, then dictating it and finally reviewing it by having someone it re-read to him – a remarkable feat of memory and determination. The article is a jewel and most appropriate for Christmas and the season of self-reflection. Have a wonderful Christmas, happy holidays and a healthy and prosperous New Year.
By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. November 19, 2024
Interview with Karen Linkletter at the 16th Global Peter Drucker Forum 2024  Video Interview
Show More
Share by: