Management as a Liberal Art Research Institute

On the Nexus Between Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Byron Ramirez, Ph.D.

PUBLISHED:

June 12, 2024

Entrepreneurs are motivated by the possibility that the products and services they deliver can add value to society. But they also are keenly aware that in order to operate sustainably, they need to generate profits. As a result, thriving entrepreneurs constantly re-evaluate their products or services, the market in which they compete, and the way they produce and distribute their offerings. Moreover, entrepreneurs understand that in order to survive the intense rivalry and competition they face in the marketplace, they must find ways to continually innovate. 


Entrepreneurs’ efforts to offer goods and services to the market often leads to innovation as entrepreneurs introduce new ways of doing things and engage in a process referred to as ‘creative destruction’. Joseph Schumpeter coined this term to describe the inherently disorderly process of change, where ideas, products, firms, and whole industries are displaced by new innovations. Schumpeter posited that entrepreneurs’ principal contribution to society is to advocate for change and disruption, and in doing so, they help advance society.  Schumpeter conceptually established the ‘entrepreneur as innovator’ as a key figure in driving economic development.


Schumpeter argued that innovation is a critical factor of economic change. He indicated that economic change orbits around innovation, entrepreneurial activities, and market power. Schumpeter asserted that innovation-originated market power could provide better results than price competition and the invisible hand. Additionally, he suggested that innovation often creates temporary monopolies, allowing anomalous profits that would soon be contested away by imitators and rivals. He explained that these temporary monopolies were needed to provide the incentive required for other firms to develop new products and processes. 


The entrepreneur introduces new things, processes, and business acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods. And the entrepreneur is willing to bear the risk associated with introducing change. The innovative activities of entrepreneurs feed a creative ‘destruction process’ by causing constant disturbances to an economic system in equilibrium, thus creating opportunities for generating income and profits. Hence, entrepreneurship disrupts the stationary flow of the economic system, and in this manner initiates and sustains the process of economic development. In adjusting to a new equilibrium, other innovations are spun off, and more entrepreneurs enter the economic system, introducing new products and services, thereby fostering advancement.


In similar fashion, entrepreneurial firms engage in creative destruction and thus are able to capture a share of the market by replacing firms that have failed to produce valuable products and services. The creative destruction process incentivizes firms to develop new products, services, and processes; otherwise, they will not survive in the long run. Accordingly, entrepreneurship encompasses the market entry of new firms, but it also supports the development of innovative activities in existing firms that allow them to create continuing value in the marketplace. In this vein, innovation can be characterized as the development of a new product, service, or process as the firm embarks upon new combinations of the factors of production. 


Innovation is a complex, dynamic process that requires commitment, resources, and investment. Often times, firms will modify their existing business model, re-arranging the manner in how they develop a product or the way they deliver new product functionalities or services to their customers. Modifications to an existing organizational process, to an existing business model, or even to a service delivery method, are all examples of how innovation is harnessed towards the pursuit of greater effectiveness and efficiency.


Innovation can be characterized as the development of a new process or product (or service) that meets new requirements and/or existing market needs. Drucker tells us: “Innovation should be focused on a specific need that it satisfies, on a specific end result that it produces” (Drucker, 1985). Innovation allows for more effective products, processes, services, technologies, and ideas to be made readily available to markets, and society in general. As a result, innovation is used by the enterprise (firm) as a means of meeting the needs of consumers; as a tool for competing with other enterprises in an existing market; and as an instrument for entering into a new market. Hence, innovation conceptually increases the likelihood of the enterprise achieving economic efficiency in the short run, and may allow the enterprise to establish a more competitive long-run position. Nonetheless, the enterprise encounters internal constraints (e.g. cost of inputs) and external constraints (e.g. market competition) that make it challenging for it to subsist in a market. Moreover, diminishing marginal returns influence the production capability of the enterprise. Based on these basic premises, innovation can be considered essential for the long-term economic survival and success of enterprises across different sectors and industries. 


According to some scholars, innovation can help improve the long-term survival of a firm as it can enhance its product line / service line offering while enabling it to establish a competitive advantage over other firms (Antonelli, 2003; Lundvall, 2007; Porter, 1990; Schumpeter, 1936; Teece and Pisano, 1994). It is worth noting that the firm that chooses to innovate does so based primarily on the information that it has about preferences, wants and needs of consumers in its market.  In other words, the firm innovates because it recognizes the opportunity and value of meeting consumers’ needs and wants in the short-run and sees the innovation investment as a means to also help position itself effectively for the long run. Drucker reminds us that: “purposeful, systematic innovation begins with the analysis of the opportunities” (Drucker, 1985) And since the firm most often faces competition, innovation becomes an avenue through which the firm can differentiate its products from those of other competing firms. 


Innovation is the successful embodiment of a useful idea in the marketplace, where the idea can be commercialized. Innovation also allows the firm to re-configure resources more efficiently, and hence allows it to increase productivity, with the implication that this can help augment profit. Innovation has helped build companies and grow and develop industries. For instance, just two decades ago, organizations struggled managing the vast amount of information and data related to their ongoing customer interactions. Since 1999, Salesforce has revolutionized how organizations keep track of customer interactions and manage their sales data. Since its founding, Salesforce has developed multiple iterations of its products, leading to a sophisticated cloud-based enterprise software which supports customer relationship management (CRM). Salesforce’s innovative solutions include sales force automation, customer service and support, marketing automation, and digital commerce. Salesforce has enabled large organizations around the globe to automate their sales and marketing processes and to become increasingly efficient, while becoming effective managers of customer data and information. 


Innovation is not a linear process. Instead, innovation is a highly iterative process of re-considering many internal technical and operational factors, and external factors, with an ever-changing interpretation of how the firm might continue to develop and deliver products and services. The firm in which innovation is fostered must support the diverse iterations, interactions, and transactions needed to support innovation efforts. The entrepreneur, who does not mind the uncertainty and risk, is able to manage this dynamic process. 


Innovation that addresses a real market need or want delivers value to society. Yet, innovation requires that firms systematically analyze opportunities that are present. Hence, the entrepreneur and entrepreneurial firm must be able to develop the ability to observe and perceive the evolving needs of people. The entrepreneur must then focus on delivering a solution that meets a specific set of needs or wants. This implies that innovation must be purposeful. And it also requires that the entrepreneur is not only disciplined, but willing to invest in acquiring knowledge which can be applied productively. Both the entrepreneur and entrepreneurial firm must continually re-evaluate their products and services, analyze the market in which they compete, and re-consider the way they produce and distribute their products and services. By embracing innovation, they will advocate for change and disruption, and help advance society. 



References


Antonelli, C. (2003). The economics of innovation, new technologies and structural change: studies in global competition series. New York, NY: Routledge.


Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. New York, NY: Harper Business.


Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems—analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.


Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc.


Schumpeter, J.A. (1936). The Theory of Economic Development, Second Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University press.


Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537-556.

By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. January 6, 2025
On December 13, 2024, we lost a seminal management philosopher and theorist: Charles Handy. Like Peter Drucker, Handy was a social thinker and management theorist who emphasized the human side of work as more important than profits and valued individual growth and development in organizations. Handy was born in Ireland and studied at Oxford. In 1956, he went to work for Shell, working in Borneo, where he met his future wife, Elizabeth Hill. Disillusioned by corporate life, Handy left Shell in 1962 to study management at MIT in their executive program. Inspired by their humanistic approach, he returned to London in 1967 to start the London Business School. Handy knew Drucker and was a regular keynote speaker at the Global Drucker Forum in Vienna. The two men had much in common in terms of their approaches to management and social theory. Like Drucker, Handy became an author (although, unlike Drucker, Handy was a corporate executive before he turned to writing). Handy wrote not just on business but also society, serving as much as a social ecologist as Drucker was. In his pivotal book, The Age of Unreason (1989), Handy argued for the disruption of discontinuity – resulting in a new world of business, education, and work that was highly unpredictable. He rejected shareholder capitalism and saw the organization as a place for human purpose and fulfillment, based on trust. Like Drucker, Handy advocated federalism in organizations, disseminating authority and responsibility to the lowest possible levels. He also saw “the future that had already happened.” Handy coined the term “portfolio life,” where knowledge workers would increasingly work remotely and for multiple organizations. In the 1980s, he posited that society consisted of “shamrock organizations”: those that had three integrated leaves: full-time employees, outside contractors, and temporary workers. Handy thus foresaw the new “gig economy” and increasingly autonomy of knowledge work. Finally, like Drucker, Handy had a life partner who not only supported his career but was an independent woman with her own interests. Liz Handy, like Doris Drucker, was an entrepreneur who ran an interior design business, and later was a professional photographer and Charles’s business agent.  Minglo Shao, founder of CIAM, remembers Handy as a warm man who made several important contributions to what we see as the fundamentals of Management as a Liberal Art. We are thankful for Handy’s contributions to management theory and social thought, and for his legacy at the Global Drucker Forum in the form of the Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series.
By Richard and Ilse Straub with the Drucker Forum Team December 29, 2024
For 15 years, Charles Handy did us the enormous honor of choosing the Drucker Forum as a privileged platform for delivering his message to the world, and particularly to the younger generation in which he had such faith. Following up on our initial announcement of Charles’ passing Charles Handy (1932–2024) , we are honored to share a selection of his key contributions to the Forum with our wider community. Charles’ brilliant keynotes at the Drucker Forum have become legendary. Normally accessible only to members of the Drucker Society, from today they are available as recordings to the wider public for a period of 30 days. At the first centennial Forum in 2009, Charles talked about his debt to Peter Drucker while outlining his own fundamental management concepts that he had developed over the years. Two years later, he touched on the ideas of Adam Smith and demonstrated how much more to them there was than the celebrated “invisible hand” of self-interest. In his landmark closing address in 2017, pursuing a thread developed in his 2015 book The Second Curve, he called for a management reformation that would turn it into a tool for the common good – thus drawing the first contours of what we would announce six years later as the Next Management . We took to heart his exhortation not to wait for great leaders but “to start small fires in the darkness, until they spread and the whole world is alight with a better vision of what we could do with our businesses”. Management’s "second curve" will be the focus of the “Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series” in 2025. Following the loss of his beloved wife Elizabeth in 2018 and a severe stroke, Charles was much reduced in mobility in his last years – but not in his determination to continue spreading his message of hope to the world. He couldn’t participate in person in the Drucker Forum 2022, but he participated in a moving online interview with his son Scott, who directed young actors in a short performance of Beckett’s Waiting for Godot by Beckett to illustrate some points.  Charles also contributed valued digital articles for our blog and for Drucker Forum partners. Even during the most difficult period of his life he continued to write and develop his ideas in weekly columns for the Idler magazine. This entailed first memorizing the article, then dictating it and finally reviewing it by having someone it re-read to him – a remarkable feat of memory and determination. The article is a jewel and most appropriate for Christmas and the season of self-reflection. Have a wonderful Christmas, happy holidays and a healthy and prosperous New Year.
By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. November 19, 2024
Interview with Karen Linkletter at the 16th Global Peter Drucker Forum 2024  Video Interview
Show More
Share by: