Management as a Liberal Art Research Institute

The Three Knowledge Pillars of MLA

Pooya Tabesh, Ph.D.

PUBLISHED:

July 2, 2024

Management as a liberal art (MLA) was first introduced by Peter Drucker as a practical approach for achieving effective and responsible management. MLA portrays management as a multi-disciplinary phenomenon built on a comprehensive understanding of all internal and external aspects related to the business environment. Effective implementation of MLA not only requires the knowledge of organizational drivers of firm performance, but also a foundational grasp of how individual and societal factors can impact business operations and their outcomes. Organizations are comprised of individual decision makers whose characteristics directly influence organizational outcomes. Similarly, the external realities in a society such as needs and characteristics of stakeholders, political landscape, or global trends have a significant influence on business operations. Based on these assumptions, it is safe to argue that successful practice of MLA requires a manager’s broad knowledge of individual, society, and organization, that I refer to as the three knowledge pillars of MLA (see Figure 1). 


                                                                                      Figure 1. The three knowledge pillars of MLA



In this blog post, my goal is to briefly explain these three knowledge pillars of MLA by grounding them in Peter Drucker’s work and identify disciplines that can serve as a reliable source of knowledge for each area. I also list some keywords related to each pillar based on the word count analysis of Drucker’s work[1]. These keywords are among the most frequently used words in the body of Drucker’s books that can exemplify his emphasis on each area. 


Knowledge of Individual

·      Disciplines: Psychology, theology

·      Representative keywords in Drucker’s books (word frequency rankings in parentheses): people (6th), man (23rd)


In its most basic form, management is defined as getting work done through people. For Drucker, people are at the heart of MLA (Drucker, 1989), and he believed that organizations need to bring people together to accomplish a shared goal. Also, he pays particular attention to the ultimate importance of people in a functioning society. Here, the individual is still in the center stage for Drucker. For instance, in The Future of Industrial Man (Drucker, 1942), he writes: “[society] must give status and function to the individual.” In addition, he has highlighted that if institutions cannot function well, they will not be able to provide people with meaning and status (Drucker, 1942). 


Understanding individual characteristics of employees (e.g., personality) is at the focus of disciplines such as psychology and organizational behavior. It is important for managers to understand how differences in personality, attitudes, values, and beliefs influence individual performance in organizations. According to Peter Drucker (1955), in his book Practice of Management, managers’ knowledge of employees’ attitudes and outcomes helps them create a better relationship with employees. Differences in spirituality, religion, and moral values have also been found as important factors that influence effective management of people at work. In his book, New Realities (1989), Drucker writes that “Management is thus what tradition used to call a liberal art …. because it deals with the fundamentals of knowledge, self-knowledge, wisdom, and leadership.”


Knowledge of Organization

·      Disciplines: Business (all areas) and economics

·      Representative keywords in Drucker’s books (word frequency rankings in parentheses): Business (1st), management (2nd), performance (26th), production (39th


Performance is the single most important outcome in the practice of business. In the words of Peter Drucker (1950) in his book, The New Society, “the first responsibility of management is the responsibility for economic performance.” Achieving superior levels of performance by organizations requires making effective managerial decisions. Effective decisions can only be made by knowledgeable managers who not only understand the individuals (e.g., employees’ needs and attitudes) and the environmental context (e.g., society including all stakeholders) but possess certain managerial skills in understanding the organization (e.g., resources and capabilities) and the key success factors. As an example, a general knowledge of fundamentals of value generation from customers to profit is important. Similarly, knowledge of finance and accounting is important for successful management. According to Peter Drucker, by focusing on performance, and on productive activity that is mission-driven and accountable, organizations can give people status and function, and provide checks and balances on power.


Knowledge of Society

·      Disciplines: Sociology, political science, and history

·      Representative keywords in Drucker’s books (word frequency rankings in parentheses): society (8th), government (18th), politics (28th), power (35th)


Organizations do not operate in a vacuum. The environment within which organizations operate is influenced by society (e.g., various stakeholders). Therefore, an effective manager needs to be knowledgeable about the trends and realities in the local and global environment. 

A good understanding of society-level trends is addressed at the heart of disciplines such as political science, sociology and history. A manager familiar with historical and societal context can better understand the needs and requirements of internal and external stakeholders to lead the organization to not only achieve economic prosperity but also to fulfill and respond to the demands from customers, suppliers, competitors, governments, and communities.


Conclusion

Peter Drucker's extensive work provides a rich foundation for understanding the relationships between individual, organization, and society as the three knowledge pillars of MLA. By integrating insights from various disciplines, managers can better appreciate the context within which a business operates. Embracing these multidisciplinary perspectives ensures that managers can lead their organizations responsibly and sustainably, ultimately contributing to the broader societal good.


References:

Drucker, P.F. (1942), The Future of Industrial Man, The John Day Company, New York, NY.

Drucker, P.F. (1955), The Practice of Management, Heinemann, London.

Drucker, P.F. (1989), The New Realities, Harper and Row, New York, NY.


[1]
 Please see https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-04-2022-0011 for a comprehensive text analysis of Drucker’s work

By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. January 6, 2025
On December 13, 2024, we lost a seminal management philosopher and theorist: Charles Handy. Like Peter Drucker, Handy was a social thinker and management theorist who emphasized the human side of work as more important than profits and valued individual growth and development in organizations. Handy was born in Ireland and studied at Oxford. In 1956, he went to work for Shell, working in Borneo, where he met his future wife, Elizabeth Hill. Disillusioned by corporate life, Handy left Shell in 1962 to study management at MIT in their executive program. Inspired by their humanistic approach, he returned to London in 1967 to start the London Business School. Handy knew Drucker and was a regular keynote speaker at the Global Drucker Forum in Vienna. The two men had much in common in terms of their approaches to management and social theory. Like Drucker, Handy became an author (although, unlike Drucker, Handy was a corporate executive before he turned to writing). Handy wrote not just on business but also society, serving as much as a social ecologist as Drucker was. In his pivotal book, The Age of Unreason (1989), Handy argued for the disruption of discontinuity – resulting in a new world of business, education, and work that was highly unpredictable. He rejected shareholder capitalism and saw the organization as a place for human purpose and fulfillment, based on trust. Like Drucker, Handy advocated federalism in organizations, disseminating authority and responsibility to the lowest possible levels. He also saw “the future that had already happened.” Handy coined the term “portfolio life,” where knowledge workers would increasingly work remotely and for multiple organizations. In the 1980s, he posited that society consisted of “shamrock organizations”: those that had three integrated leaves: full-time employees, outside contractors, and temporary workers. Handy thus foresaw the new “gig economy” and increasingly autonomy of knowledge work. Finally, like Drucker, Handy had a life partner who not only supported his career but was an independent woman with her own interests. Liz Handy, like Doris Drucker, was an entrepreneur who ran an interior design business, and later was a professional photographer and Charles’s business agent.  Minglo Shao, founder of CIAM, remembers Handy as a warm man who made several important contributions to what we see as the fundamentals of Management as a Liberal Art. We are thankful for Handy’s contributions to management theory and social thought, and for his legacy at the Global Drucker Forum in the form of the Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series.
By Richard and Ilse Straub with the Drucker Forum Team December 29, 2024
For 15 years, Charles Handy did us the enormous honor of choosing the Drucker Forum as a privileged platform for delivering his message to the world, and particularly to the younger generation in which he had such faith. Following up on our initial announcement of Charles’ passing Charles Handy (1932–2024) , we are honored to share a selection of his key contributions to the Forum with our wider community. Charles’ brilliant keynotes at the Drucker Forum have become legendary. Normally accessible only to members of the Drucker Society, from today they are available as recordings to the wider public for a period of 30 days. At the first centennial Forum in 2009, Charles talked about his debt to Peter Drucker while outlining his own fundamental management concepts that he had developed over the years. Two years later, he touched on the ideas of Adam Smith and demonstrated how much more to them there was than the celebrated “invisible hand” of self-interest. In his landmark closing address in 2017, pursuing a thread developed in his 2015 book The Second Curve, he called for a management reformation that would turn it into a tool for the common good – thus drawing the first contours of what we would announce six years later as the Next Management . We took to heart his exhortation not to wait for great leaders but “to start small fires in the darkness, until they spread and the whole world is alight with a better vision of what we could do with our businesses”. Management’s "second curve" will be the focus of the “Charles and Elizabeth Handy Lecture Series” in 2025. Following the loss of his beloved wife Elizabeth in 2018 and a severe stroke, Charles was much reduced in mobility in his last years – but not in his determination to continue spreading his message of hope to the world. He couldn’t participate in person in the Drucker Forum 2022, but he participated in a moving online interview with his son Scott, who directed young actors in a short performance of Beckett’s Waiting for Godot by Beckett to illustrate some points.  Charles also contributed valued digital articles for our blog and for Drucker Forum partners. Even during the most difficult period of his life he continued to write and develop his ideas in weekly columns for the Idler magazine. This entailed first memorizing the article, then dictating it and finally reviewing it by having someone it re-read to him – a remarkable feat of memory and determination. The article is a jewel and most appropriate for Christmas and the season of self-reflection. Have a wonderful Christmas, happy holidays and a healthy and prosperous New Year.
By Karen Linkletter Ph.D. November 19, 2024
Interview with Karen Linkletter at the 16th Global Peter Drucker Forum 2024  Video Interview
Show More
Share by: